Obviously, Janet did better than the receipts either one of us are using. Forbes never contested that figure, They just said she wasn't a billionaire. Janet's team released figures of $458 million (without inflation). The link I'm quoting gauges it at $315 million. BTW, your receipt has Janet grossing $256 million (without inflation).
That means, even less people attended the janet. Her overall attendance was higher for just the AFY dates. If she only sold 2 million tickets for those three tours, she would be averaging less than 700,000 attendance per those tour. If it's just the North American dates, like most artists, the majority of her dates (over half) are usually in North America She would have more than 161 dates with just her North American dates (She performed 68 shows in the US for just the AFY tour alone). That would mean she earned over half of her entire touring gross from just the AFY tour? Does Billboard Boxscore only cover North American dates or worldwide? If it's worldwide, even according to YOUR receipts Janet performed 312 shows with the janet, VR, and AFY tours. The All For You Tour grossed $55 million (According to your receipts). So, what exactly is your primary source? There are a multitude of issues here. Also, it wasn't challenged by you (or anyone else) in that UKmix thread that you are sourcing. You never brought up any issue you had in the original thread. I'm not going to let you belittle this project for the sake of your ego, though. You're picking at any and every "inaccuracy" (even things you misread and/or misheard) to make yourself feel better. Everything you've mentioned have been things we simply disagree on, and that's fine. It's only an issue now, because you're nitpicking to satisfy your own ego. Yes, it is arguing semantics, because she was the first artist to do in the decades mentioned, regardless. Do you have the official break down of the 160M tally? If not, I have to go with the sources that say RN's updated tally is nearly 20 million world wide. Meaning her team researched and updated stats when necessary. Even in that press release, Janet's team quotes the 100 million total that they were using at that time There's no way she sold 60 million records since 2008. As with the example I made about Janet's overall album sales, further investigation sometimes reveals something different. The venue can hold 60-70,000 with the open floor stage set up. BTW, 55,000 is the capacity for the end stage configuration. Which exactly how we worded it in the video, with the actual capacity of the venue (From the Tokyo Dome site). The first international shows were in Japan, where she sold out the Tokyo Dome (48,000 capacity) - Not people in attendance. The 2008 press release mentions the capacity of the stadium itself. Meaning, Janet did better than either calculation, excluding inflation. The original figures I linked were off by $100 million from the Vanity stats, and your figures are off by over $200 million. BTW, the Vanity article reported actual overall touring revenue, not figures based on inflation (Again, even Forbes didn't counter that). It's all guestimate work, because Janet's team chose not to report the majority of her tour dates. Multiple 30-50,000 seat venues could be missing from the reported data. Were most of the reported dates from the AFY era (Which has most of the available box off data from those three tours)? If so, Janet played some of her biggest venues with the janet and VR tours. Literally, millions of tickets aren't accounted for.
Rhythm Nation isn't included, and over half the dates from the janet. Any questions you had related more so to do with the Number Ones Tours (Which was going on at the time) and trying to gauge figures for that. You didn't express any skepticism in that thread.
0 kommentar(er)
